<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Better Communication Results - Latest Comments in Reflections on blog links</title><link>http://bcr.disqus.com/</link><description>Lee's new and improved better communication results blog</description><atom:link href="https://bcr.disqus.com/reflections_on_blog_links/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 03:39:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Reflections on blog links</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/06/30/reflections-on-blog-links/#comment-22698222</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...but then again, I'm a wordsmith so maybe that explains why I love longer posts to shorter ones... I love how some writers (Kathy Sierra is a case in point, as is Shel Holtz when he's 'on a roll') create full-colour pictures when they write&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 03:39:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reflections on blog links</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/06/30/reflections-on-blog-links/#comment-22698221</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kami, of COURSE I would still read you -- it is your brain and how you dump that onto the web that stimulates and interests me, not your working status. We both know of someone who is having a hard time at the moment and she may not be picking up much work, but does that mean we stop reading her? Absolutely not!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 03:37:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reflections on blog links</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/06/30/reflections-on-blog-links/#comment-22698220</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, and I thought I was already too long winded.  Also, there is that little thing called work.  Would you listen to me if I was unemployed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kami Huyse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 14:09:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reflections on blog links</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/06/30/reflections-on-blog-links/#comment-22698219</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One of my golden rules is: only blog when it feels right to do so. I don't feel we should have to blog to any pattern. Sometimes my 'insightful' commentary days are also the days when something or someone is annoying me and sometimes my clippings days are also my peaceful reading days when I have time to scan through, and read, much more of my 800+ feeds than is usually the case. Like Anna I value the serendipidity of scanning through stuff that on first glance might be outside my main area of interest. But, yes, links usually means I'm busy with non-blogging stuff.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trevor Cook</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:48:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reflections on blog links</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/06/30/reflections-on-blog-links/#comment-22698218</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One thing I would add is that I always make sure that I have a group of blogs - i.e. yours! - that is not necessarily in my sphere, but that it stimulates ideas to use in my area...employee engagement and development. This way you don't get too narrow and can learn from other spheres. So a mix of tech, comms, marketing, HR and corporate etc gives me a more rounded insight....or at least I think it does!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anna Farmery</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:11:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reflections on blog links</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/06/30/reflections-on-blog-links/#comment-22698217</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Kami, you and me both, girl! [smile] Give me longer posts, Kami -- I like your mind, and I am hungry for more of what makes Kami tick. Remember, long copy is better than short copy as long as it's not boring; your copy is good, i just want more of it! Show me your soul, girl!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:51:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reflections on blog links</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2006/06/30/reflections-on-blog-links/#comment-22698216</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It was seth Godin and Hugh McLeod made up the two immutable laws of blogging:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;    1. "Nobody's going to read your blog unless there's something in it for them." -Seth Godin.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;    2. "Nobody's going to link to your blog unless there's something in it for them." -Hugh MacLeod&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I certainly hope I can earn your readership over time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kami Huyse</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:40:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>