<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Better Communication Results - Latest Comments in It&amp;#8217;s flattering, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://bcr.disqus.com/</link><description>Lee's new and improved better communication results blog</description><atom:link href="https://bcr.disqus.com/it8217s_flattering_but8230/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 02:06:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s flattering, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/01/its-flattering-but/#comment-22699873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to agree with you 100 per cent.  I've had around half a dozen approaches in the last six months to speak at conferences.  Some I've done for free, as I actually wanted to be there, others paid for my costs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The money most conferences make from charging attendees in excess of AU$2000 for a 2-3 day conference should make it easy for them to cover at least speaker costs, and perhaps even pay the speakers a reasonable fee for their time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I blogged about this very issue in September at &lt;a href="http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/09/14/no-consultants-go-figure/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/09/14/no-consultants-go-figure/"&gt;http://www.acidlabs.org/200...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Attending is a different matter. I'm as happy to get an occasional comp as the next guy, but if I am prepared to pay for a conference, I make sure my selection is careful.  Again I've discussed this issue at acidlabs - &lt;a href="http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/27/conferences-and-value/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/27/conferences-and-value/"&gt;http://www.acidlabs.org/200...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trib</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 02:06:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s flattering, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/01/its-flattering-but/#comment-22699880</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cripes, Lee; your New Yrs resolution was obv a 'zero tolerance' policy!! yet added to L Papworth's experience, many 'experts' may be being fleeced. For eg; I've spoken in Middle East and had airfares, all accom/transfers and food on top of my full day rate speaker fees. Other conf organisers (in ME and Asia Pac) have asked me to submit detailed prez props - but when I outlined fees, they drafted in other speakers who (just may have) been able to access my proposal materials. Yet I may still do expenses only gigs, by way of giving back to the industries which I earn from.&lt;br&gt;Best, Gerry&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gerry</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:17:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s flattering, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/01/its-flattering-but/#comment-22699881</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mind you, there are days when Mrs BetterComms and I would *willingly* sell one of the children!&lt;br&gt;:-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:52:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s flattering, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/01/its-flattering-but/#comment-22699883</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lee - "I'm sorry".  No way - you are being realistic - no need for apologies!  Good for you for putting your foot down.  Bravo!&lt;br&gt;Happy New Year to you, Mrs. BetterComms and the (unslave-like) children!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Donna Tocci</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:41:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s flattering, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/01/its-flattering-but/#comment-22699879</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WOW!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks, everyone, for your support on this issue --- as I mentioned, I was worried that my stance would appear arrogant and self-important.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I truly wish I *could* attend all of the wonderful conferences I'm invited to, but without having won the lottery I just cannot afford to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I REALLY appreciate that you share my concerns about misuse and abuse of willing evangelists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kindests,&lt;br&gt;Lee&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;p.s. and have a fabulous 2008!&lt;br&gt;p.p.s. and WONDERFUL to hear from you, Jenni -- I thought you'd dropped off the face of the earth!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:10:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s flattering, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/01/its-flattering-but/#comment-22699878</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Lee,&lt;br&gt;I'm glad that you let Mrs. C help keep things in perspective.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We have a thing here too called 'Minnesota nice'.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;good post sir!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Connie Bensen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 22:32:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s flattering, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/01/its-flattering-but/#comment-22699877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lee, you articulated it eloquently. Commercial conference producers have for too long taken advantage of the eagerness of speakers to appear before these "valuable" audiences. The audiences are so valuable they are paying the conference providers hundreds of dollars to be there. The LEAST the conference producers could do is pay for the talent at the show. You have spoken truth to (rapidly diminishing) power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bravo for drawing a personal line in the sand.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PodcastSteve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:26:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s flattering, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/01/its-flattering-but/#comment-22699876</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree Lee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You may have read Laurel Papworth's recent and related post about new/social media expertsin Australia being continually invited in for 'chats' and a few 'ideas' then not followed up for work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://silkcharm.blogspot.com/2007/12/raping-web-20-australian-community.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://silkcharm.blogspot.com/2007/12/raping-web-20-australian-community.html"&gt;http://silkcharm.blogspot.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps any emerging area needs to establish credentials first before the dollars flow but I think we would all agree that we are past that stage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jenni Beattie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:59:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s flattering, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/01/its-flattering-but/#comment-22699875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lee - It's not being unreasonable at all. Personally I think more of the evangelists need to monetize in 2008. I'm one of them. It's not being stingy. Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Dugan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 08:23:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s flattering, but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2008/01/01/its-flattering-but/#comment-22699874</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If all they cover is your air fares, accommodation and meals, then their being stingy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know you have helped charities out, so any business oriented conference can fly, sleep, feed AND PAY for your time - you don't need to feel that your attitude is unethical or un-"Australia" - I know that you have given of yourself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Tell 'em they're dreaming!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Castle" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Castle"&gt;http://simple.wikipedia.org...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;OR they could just subscribe to your RSS feed, it has a few gems in it ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ben.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Hamilton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 08:05:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>