<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Better Communication Results - Latest Comments in Flock &amp;#8211; good, but not THAT good</title><link>http://bcr.disqus.com/</link><description>Lee's new and improved better communication results blog</description><atom:link href="https://bcr.disqus.com/flock_8211_good_but_not_that_good/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:04:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Flock &amp;#8211; good, but not THAT good</title><link>http://www.leehopkins.net/2007/11/11/flock-good-but-not-that-good/#comment-22699751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Lee,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for trying Flock!  Most Firefox extensions do work with Flock.  We don't automatically port them over for several reasons, the primary one being that most people have a lot of superfluous extensions, and we suggest trying to exist without them to see if you really need them.  Additionally, extensions can affect performance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You should be able to install those extensions in the same way you did with Firefox.  If you get an error message, it's pretty easy to change the .xpi to make them work.  It's not ideal, but it's not that difficult I've done it before).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope you'll give Flock another chance!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Evan Hamilton&lt;br&gt;Flock Community Ambassador&lt;br&gt;evan at flock dot com&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evan Hamilton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:04:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>